TO all of those Liberals who are conned by the CBC and think only Canadians are peacemakers and heros, please have a boo at this Youtube. I am proud of the Canadian Soldiers and Canada's approach. I am equally as proud of the American soldiers who are peacemakers; something the CBC would never portray.
The pictures that follow show a bravery, a provident and a providential manner that can not lose. Youtube is the American version and, of course, a little more Hollywood but the same story. Now if I were really creative I'd do a Youtube Canadian version with song etc. The pictures are the Canadian version.
One picture is worth a thousand suicide bombers.
Thursday, January 04, 2007
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Liberal Farce:The Face Of Dion
Bob Rae or Dion will be the new leader of the Liberal Party. When one knows the nature of the beast it is easy to predict. The Liberals are socialists. Bob Rae is a socialist. Dion is the typical francophone catholic socialist that is the essence of the Liberal Party. Ignatieff doesnt have a hope in the Liberal Party as he is too Protestant. Therefore the socialists Liberals will elect a socialist Rae or Dion.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Global Warming Totally Destroying BC Forest
The pine beetle used to be killed off each winter by the freezing cold. No more. They survive each winter now thanks to global warming. And the beetle population grows and grows and eats more and more trees....destroying an entire Provincial forest.
You may think we can ignor global warming. Not so! It has brought about the destruction of the BC forest and which invasion will cross the pine tundra west to east from the Yukon to northern Quebec by the year 2010. The pine beetle is coming along with the pineapple express. That red area of the middle of British Columbia has been destroyed and killed by the pine beetle; turned into dry cinder, a standing fire hazard; an entire forest gone, divestated, completely and totally gone, dead. Trees that took a hundred years to grow have been ate up like candy in a dozen years; pine beetle candy.
Take a look at the critter coming to you real soon. Thank you Buzz Hargrove! Thank you Ford. Thank you Chevrolet. Thank you GMC.
You may think we can ignor global warming. Not so! It has brought about the destruction of the BC forest and which invasion will cross the pine tundra west to east from the Yukon to northern Quebec by the year 2010. The pine beetle is coming along with the pineapple express. That red area of the middle of British Columbia has been destroyed and killed by the pine beetle; turned into dry cinder, a standing fire hazard; an entire forest gone, divestated, completely and totally gone, dead. Trees that took a hundred years to grow have been ate up like candy in a dozen years; pine beetle candy.
Take a look at the critter coming to you real soon. Thank you Buzz Hargrove! Thank you Ford. Thank you Chevrolet. Thank you GMC.
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Remembrance Day
Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae, MD (1872-1918) Canadian Army
IN FLANDERS FIELDS the poppies blow Between the crosses row on row,
IN FLANDERS FIELDS the poppies blow Between the crosses row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky The larks, still bravely singing, fly Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the Dead. Short days ago We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow, Loved and were loved, and now we lie In Flanders fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, though poppies grow In Flanders fields.
We are the Dead. Short days ago We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow, Loved and were loved, and now we lie In Flanders fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, though poppies grow In Flanders fields.
Meanwhile in Afghanistan...
Friday, October 13, 2006
Liberal Philosophy
The current Liberal Philosophy is to let the Media brainwash the masses. The CBC! The CBC! The CBC! The CBC!!! I guess we should throw Jane "I am wearing a popsicle stick" Tabor into that mix This last one reminds me of Jane Tabor from the Globe and Mail or on the CTV Duffy Stronach Liberal Love In Happy Hour. Unreal! It has been some 5 years since I deleted the CBC from my TV and I am so tempted to do the same with CTV. I wish I had an ALTERNATIVE.
My thanks go to politicallywhat and the Times Communist.
When are Muslims going to learn how to tolerate and accept western culture? It's ok to piss on everybody else, but not allah! That's not hypocritical, right! When was the last time you heard about a Buddhish killing a Muslim or a Christian for not believing in his faith? You hear about a Muslim killing somebody everyday for not believing in his faith! This is bullshit and all you liberals know it! CTV should send Jane over to Saudia Arabia to cover some news story or another; a jellaba would be an improvement on her. We wouldn't be able to see her mouth move. Why she sides with the terrorists and Liberals is insane but why does CTV allow her to go on and on about it. It's not like there haven't been 6,182 deadly terrorist attacks since 9/11!
My thanks go to politicallywhat and the Times Communist.
When are Muslims going to learn how to tolerate and accept western culture? It's ok to piss on everybody else, but not allah! That's not hypocritical, right! When was the last time you heard about a Buddhish killing a Muslim or a Christian for not believing in his faith? You hear about a Muslim killing somebody everyday for not believing in his faith! This is bullshit and all you liberals know it! CTV should send Jane over to Saudia Arabia to cover some news story or another; a jellaba would be an improvement on her. We wouldn't be able to see her mouth move. Why she sides with the terrorists and Liberals is insane but why does CTV allow her to go on and on about it. It's not like there haven't been 6,182 deadly terrorist attacks since 9/11!
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Western Canada is Canada's Future
Prime Minister Harper is the Phil Gaglardi of Canada. BC'ers know the flying Minister of Highways of the 60's opened up BC to the world with his mountain passes and bridges and highways and ski hills in a way that is unmatched to this day. It is those roads that Gaglardi built that keeps BC green today. And I mean green in a way that the Green Party doesn't.
The bridges built by flying Phil Gaglardi, BC's Minister of Highways, span every city in this Province. The man is an icon of BC's history. He was a fighter. Phil Gaglardi made BC what it is today whether it be ferry's, like BC Ferries, bridges like the Port Mann, tunnels like the Deas Island Tunnel or highways like the Rogers Pass. Almost every bridge in every Bc City today was built by the flying Minister of Highways Phil Gaglardi. Now PM Harper is going to give us the international ports to connect to the Orient. We need another Phil Gaglardi. Thank you Steve Harper and Dave Emerson. It is about time the feds paid attention to the west instead of Quebec Quebec Quebec and Ontario
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Cartoons from the Times Colonist
A Canadian's view of the American Congress....
The Times Colonist in Victoria may be as left wing as they come but the cartoonist creats with an open mind and is so funny....
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Canadian Heros
And I know my grandchildren will visit Afghanistan and be as welcome as I was in those northern European countries I visited as a young man.
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Canadian Soldiers Make Our Country Proud
You know I must confess that I am not impressed with the fact that 7 out of 32 Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan have been killed by Americans; THAT IS one fifth. I remember going to Europe as a young man, to northern Europe. This was in 1975. One thing that really stood out and surprised me but made me proud was the very welcome reception I received from the people in the Northern European countries. The other thing that really surprised me was the negative reception that Americans got. Most of them wore and hid behind Canadian flags. I am not sure why that is but I suspect being trigger happy is one reason.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
Osamas Islam and Czechoslovakia
You know there are two types of politicians; ones that are boiled pig heads and ones that are eternal. The eternal ones are decades ahead of all others. The boiled pig heads like the NDP's Jack Layton are brain dead. These are the politicians who will give away some one else's country and naively believe in some airy-fairy, abbra cadabbra, "peace in our time" magical gimme.
In 1939, the world and that included Britain gave away Chechoslavakia to Germany's Hitler in the belief that such would lead to peace in our time. Of course, as we all know, Hitler and Germany were not satisfied with that and went on to take Poland because that was the nature, with which the world was dealing, of fascism. Those that knew the evil of that nature knew that giving away Chechoslavakia was wrong and that such would not be enough to quell the thirst of fascism's nature.
The eternal ones like Ariel Sharon who weeks after 911 besieged the world to not treat Israel like Chechoslavakia spoke with the knowledge of one who knows the nature of the evil with which we are dealing in radical Islam, with the crazy Muslims...the ones who are committed to the eradication of all infidels, Christians, Hindus, Russians, Americans, Canadians, that is non Muslims in any country anywhere. If Jack Layton thinks otherwise he might try and walk the streets of Saudi Arabia for any period of time, or Iraq, or try going door to door for your church in Pakistan.
Jack Layton would give the crazy Muslims Afghanistan because he is brain dead. In the last election there was some reference to the Chinese word for a boiled pigs head to describe Jack Layton because of the similarity of the smile that doesn't stop. It is an accurate comparison, even funny cause it is true. Anyone who has seen a boiled pigs head will recognize that eternal smile that never stops. That smile is not the only similarity between a boiled pigs head and Jack Layton. The fact they are both brain dead is another.
His support for the Taliban's position in Afghanistan is killing Canadians soldiers. His belief that Canada should negotiate with the crazy Muslims displays a naivety that surpasses Bush's naivety in going into Iraq. His eagerness to withdraw Canadian soldiers from Afghanistan only encourages the enemy. I am surprised that the average Union person supports any thing Jack Layton says. The average Union guy is not that dumb.
LAYTON WOULD NEGOTIATE WITH OSAMA"S ISLAM
In 1939, the world and that included Britain gave away Chechoslavakia to Germany's Hitler in the belief that such would lead to peace in our time. Of course, as we all know, Hitler and Germany were not satisfied with that and went on to take Poland because that was the nature, with which the world was dealing, of fascism. Those that knew the evil of that nature knew that giving away Chechoslavakia was wrong and that such would not be enough to quell the thirst of fascism's nature.
The eternal ones like Ariel Sharon who weeks after 911 besieged the world to not treat Israel like Chechoslavakia spoke with the knowledge of one who knows the nature of the evil with which we are dealing in radical Islam, with the crazy Muslims...the ones who are committed to the eradication of all infidels, Christians, Hindus, Russians, Americans, Canadians, that is non Muslims in any country anywhere. If Jack Layton thinks otherwise he might try and walk the streets of Saudi Arabia for any period of time, or Iraq, or try going door to door for your church in Pakistan.
Jack Layton would give the crazy Muslims Afghanistan because he is brain dead. In the last election there was some reference to the Chinese word for a boiled pigs head to describe Jack Layton because of the similarity of the smile that doesn't stop. It is an accurate comparison, even funny cause it is true. Anyone who has seen a boiled pigs head will recognize that eternal smile that never stops. That smile is not the only similarity between a boiled pigs head and Jack Layton. The fact they are both brain dead is another.
His support for the Taliban's position in Afghanistan is killing Canadians soldiers. His belief that Canada should negotiate with the crazy Muslims displays a naivety that surpasses Bush's naivety in going into Iraq. His eagerness to withdraw Canadian soldiers from Afghanistan only encourages the enemy. I am surprised that the average Union person supports any thing Jack Layton says. The average Union guy is not that dumb.
LAYTON WOULD NEGOTIATE WITH OSAMA"S ISLAM
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
THE MUSLIM QUESTION: Muslim Manners or Terrorism
THE MUSLIM QUESTION: Muslim Manners
It is time to analyse the Muslims in our country and determine their committment to Canadian values.
I watched CTV all day on Saturday, June 4, 2006 as I planted my patio flowers and made Victoria more flower friendly and I listened to the Toronto Police Chief and the Muslim leaders talk. Now,after 6 hours of that,I am more concerned then ever. I do not get the impression that Muslims are dealing with the problem in their midst. Instead I saw quite the opposite. I saw the Muslim leaders try to blame others, or justify the use of violence with some agenda, or make like victims. I listened to non stop bullshit.
I listened to Aly Hindy a Muslim Imam claim these criminal charges in Toronto were an attack on the Muslim community. Which is a bullshit excuse. I listened to Muslim leaders say Canada should not be joining the USA war on terror. Excuse me but this the western worlds war on terror not the USA's. I listened to Muslims try to blame the media for saying Muslims are involved. Excuse me but Muslims are involved just like they were in 911, in London, in Beslan, in Bali, in Madrid, in New Delhi, in Eqypt, in Israel, in Kashmir, in Afghanistan, in Iraq and on and on.
I listened to Muslims say that CSIS and the RCMP are feeling threatened not of terrorism but of losing their jobs and they need to creat an atmosphere of fear in the country to keep their jobs. Which is another bullshit claim or excuse! The Muslim community had an all day news session to show they are dealing with the source of the problem in their community and failed to do so. My golly. With this kind of attitude and support within the Muslim community it is no wonder that so many of their members resort to violence and suicide missions killing innocent people. I do not think the Muslim community gets the point at all.
Now today I see Muslims were hiding the ringleader of the Paris attacks. Are there radical Muslims or are they one big group?
It is time to analyse the Muslims in our country and determine their committment to Canadian values.
I watched CTV all day on Saturday, June 4, 2006 as I planted my patio flowers and made Victoria more flower friendly and I listened to the Toronto Police Chief and the Muslim leaders talk. Now,after 6 hours of that,I am more concerned then ever. I do not get the impression that Muslims are dealing with the problem in their midst. Instead I saw quite the opposite. I saw the Muslim leaders try to blame others, or justify the use of violence with some agenda, or make like victims. I listened to non stop bullshit.
I listened to Aly Hindy a Muslim Imam claim these criminal charges in Toronto were an attack on the Muslim community. Which is a bullshit excuse. I listened to Muslim leaders say Canada should not be joining the USA war on terror. Excuse me but this the western worlds war on terror not the USA's. I listened to Muslims try to blame the media for saying Muslims are involved. Excuse me but Muslims are involved just like they were in 911, in London, in Beslan, in Bali, in Madrid, in New Delhi, in Eqypt, in Israel, in Kashmir, in Afghanistan, in Iraq and on and on.
I listened to Muslims say that CSIS and the RCMP are feeling threatened not of terrorism but of losing their jobs and they need to creat an atmosphere of fear in the country to keep their jobs. Which is another bullshit claim or excuse! The Muslim community had an all day news session to show they are dealing with the source of the problem in their community and failed to do so. My golly. With this kind of attitude and support within the Muslim community it is no wonder that so many of their members resort to violence and suicide missions killing innocent people. I do not think the Muslim community gets the point at all.
Now today I see Muslims were hiding the ringleader of the Paris attacks. Are there radical Muslims or are they one big group?
Cpl Brett Lindstrom An American Hero
Cpl Brett Lindstrom (aka Lone Eagle) from the Pine Ridge Reservation, Home of the Mustangs where all Lakota warriors get an eagle feather.He died in Iraq in January 2006 during a battle with Muslim terrorists defending freedom. Thanks to ALL of the U. S. Military Men and Women Everywhere. Past and Current Living and Dead. We are free because of you.
Meanwhile in Caledonia Ontario. To Six Nations Chief Allan McNaughton I have two words.
Meanwhile in Caledonia Ontario. To Six Nations Chief Allan McNaughton I have two words.
Monday, May 22, 2006
Captain Nicola Goddard A Canadian Hero
Captain Nicola Goddard
A Canadian Hero, a real Canadiandaughter. She is the first Canadian woman to be killed in action since the Second World War, and the first female combat soldier killed on the front lines. A ship has been named after her.
STRATA TITLED EQUALS SOCIALISTIC PROPERTY
Maybe you think we still live in a country where private property reigns supreme, Well, I hate to disappoint you but you have not lived in a Strata Title Unit. Strata Councils confirm what I call the Shmoo Principle. Maybe you remember the Peter Principle where employees always get promoted to one level above their level of competence. The Shmoo Principle is that given a jurisdiction people will always legislate one level above the maximum of their given powers. This is aptly exhibited by Strata Councils in BC. Strata titled property and their strata councils are the training ground for socialists....control freeks let loose on your life. Don't buy into a strata as you will be sorry.
It may be in this day and age that strata titled property is the only property that most people can now afford. What most people have not seen, if they have not lived in a strata titled property, is the extent of strata council power and their involvement in your life. When you buy strata property, you abandon private property. That is something that realtors will never tell you.
Under the Strata Property Act of BC, Strata councils can control the age of owners in the building and the pets allowed in the building and of course under the power to control noise they can control the renovations you make to your interior, the activities inside your home, or the people in your home, or the color of your curtains, the opening and closing of your windows, etc, etc. They will tell you what you can park, where you can park and when, or if you can smoke. And this can all happen after you buy and move in.
Strata titled property is more then restricted private property. In fact, strata titled property is the antithesis of private property. Private property may give you freedom within a city̢۪s zoning. But zoning controls are further enlarged by the exercise of the powers of Strata Councils; the Shmoo Principle. And freedom is further and extensively diminished by Strata Councils. Strata titled property is socialistic property; not private property.
If you want some bored, small minded, socialistic yahoo, without a life, sitting on a Strata Council interferring in your life then by all means buy Strata.
It may be in this day and age that strata titled property is the only property that most people can now afford. What most people have not seen, if they have not lived in a strata titled property, is the extent of strata council power and their involvement in your life. When you buy strata property, you abandon private property. That is something that realtors will never tell you.
Under the Strata Property Act of BC, Strata councils can control the age of owners in the building and the pets allowed in the building and of course under the power to control noise they can control the renovations you make to your interior, the activities inside your home, or the people in your home, or the color of your curtains, the opening and closing of your windows, etc, etc. They will tell you what you can park, where you can park and when, or if you can smoke. And this can all happen after you buy and move in.
Strata titled property is more then restricted private property. In fact, strata titled property is the antithesis of private property. Private property may give you freedom within a city̢۪s zoning. But zoning controls are further enlarged by the exercise of the powers of Strata Councils; the Shmoo Principle. And freedom is further and extensively diminished by Strata Councils. Strata titled property is socialistic property; not private property.
If you want some bored, small minded, socialistic yahoo, without a life, sitting on a Strata Council interferring in your life then by all means buy Strata.
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
BC Nurses the Highest Paid In Canada
I am sure the next time some patient dies in the hallway to the waiting room trying to get into the Emergency Ward, his survivors will be so happy to know that BC Nurses are the highest paid Nurses in Canada. Salaries for the highest paid nurses in BC will rise to $90,000.00 a year by the end of a new 4 year contract between Nurses and Campbell's Liberal Government. Thank you Carole Taylor.
Carole, I'm sure Nurses left wing Union will sneak you by the line up! Of course neither Liberals nor NDPers will accept any responsibility for these victims nor will they find one willing to sell his soul to promote left wing Liberal agendas.
Carole, I'm sure Nurses left wing Union will sneak you by the line up! Of course neither Liberals nor NDPers will accept any responsibility for these victims nor will they find one willing to sell his soul to promote left wing Liberal agendas.
Sunday, April 30, 2006
Four Strong Winds
Years ago when Quebec wanted to be a distinct society I thought they needed to go to Alberta and BC to see a couple of distinct societies. These two western Provinces are complete contrary dichotomies. I spent the first 25 years in Alberta and the last 25 in BC. And I have noticed a real holistic difference between these two. Alberta is positive. BC is negative. Alberta is wholesome and innocent. BC is not what it seems on the surface and can be deceptive.
Alberta cheers the success of its citizens. BC seems to cheer the failure of its citizens. If someone in BC falls on his face the locals and the media seem to relish in his or her failure. If a Premier in Alberta has an alcohol problem and overcomes it, he is regarded as a role model, a great man, a real hero. If a Premier is BC has an alcohol problem he will never be allowed to forget it no matter what. In BC, if an Alderman or a Premier or a hockey player falls on his face, the locals are exalted, critical and negative. In fact that old adage about "people love to kick dead meat" applies to BC. In Alberta people will stop and help you get back on your feet. Americans are the same way....by the way.
This critical negativity in BC is really apparent with the likes of Bertuzzi, the Canucks hockey player. He will never be able to achieve his greatness until he plays for another town like say Calgary or Edmonton. This difference in attitude is why the Alberta hockey towns will have a dozen Stanley Cups before Vancouver gets its first. Calgarians know how to support a team. Vancouver does not. The BC feminists really love to put down a mans̢۪ man and keep him there. Alberta cheers for a winner.
The women in Alberta are real, loving, kind, and wholesome. The women in BC are raving independent feminists who are dedicated to the demands of feminism yet also want to be treated to all the rewards of a real woman. BC women know the power of tits, and high heels and use them but still demand all the benefits and advantages of a critical feminist. BC women will cut a man open. Alberta women will sew him up.
The good things that happen to BC come from outside the Province. In Alberta the good things come from within the Province. The people of Calgary or Edmonton or Red Deer or Lethbridge are friendly cooperative, helpful, giving, or supportive. The people of BC are selfish, critical, cynical, demanding, lazy and socialistic. Alberta types know what hard work is all about. Just ask any farmer or rancher around Calgary.
BC types are into alternative lifestyles, or into successive causes. In fact some BC types are addicted to negative causes that can always be rationalized as good. I am surprised they don̢۪t protest the cutting of grass. That might be confused with grass they want to cut. There are tree huggers not because they love trees but because they love to be negative. Alberta people are into projects or undertakings and bring a positive attitude to them. BC does not have a Conservative Party. Alberta does. BC is into negative socialism and politically correct albeit confusing alternatives and very committed to obfuscating other causes with this negative political correctness. Alberta likes to keep it simple, straightforward, practical and honest. Politically correct is fine in Alberta if it works and is practical. Alberta has lots of God and oil. BC has lots of covens and alternative life styles including polygamy and trees.
BC has an Ocean and Mountains and those are BC’s only and major benefits; its saving grace. Otherwise most people would choose Alberta. Four strong winds that blow lonely, seven seas that run high, think Ill go out to Alberta, weather's good there in the fall, got some friends that I go to working for….
Or something like that.
Alberta cheers the success of its citizens. BC seems to cheer the failure of its citizens. If someone in BC falls on his face the locals and the media seem to relish in his or her failure. If a Premier in Alberta has an alcohol problem and overcomes it, he is regarded as a role model, a great man, a real hero. If a Premier is BC has an alcohol problem he will never be allowed to forget it no matter what. In BC, if an Alderman or a Premier or a hockey player falls on his face, the locals are exalted, critical and negative. In fact that old adage about "people love to kick dead meat" applies to BC. In Alberta people will stop and help you get back on your feet. Americans are the same way....by the way.
This critical negativity in BC is really apparent with the likes of Bertuzzi, the Canucks hockey player. He will never be able to achieve his greatness until he plays for another town like say Calgary or Edmonton. This difference in attitude is why the Alberta hockey towns will have a dozen Stanley Cups before Vancouver gets its first. Calgarians know how to support a team. Vancouver does not. The BC feminists really love to put down a mans̢۪ man and keep him there. Alberta cheers for a winner.
The women in Alberta are real, loving, kind, and wholesome. The women in BC are raving independent feminists who are dedicated to the demands of feminism yet also want to be treated to all the rewards of a real woman. BC women know the power of tits, and high heels and use them but still demand all the benefits and advantages of a critical feminist. BC women will cut a man open. Alberta women will sew him up.
The good things that happen to BC come from outside the Province. In Alberta the good things come from within the Province. The people of Calgary or Edmonton or Red Deer or Lethbridge are friendly cooperative, helpful, giving, or supportive. The people of BC are selfish, critical, cynical, demanding, lazy and socialistic. Alberta types know what hard work is all about. Just ask any farmer or rancher around Calgary.
BC types are into alternative lifestyles, or into successive causes. In fact some BC types are addicted to negative causes that can always be rationalized as good. I am surprised they don̢۪t protest the cutting of grass. That might be confused with grass they want to cut. There are tree huggers not because they love trees but because they love to be negative. Alberta people are into projects or undertakings and bring a positive attitude to them. BC does not have a Conservative Party. Alberta does. BC is into negative socialism and politically correct albeit confusing alternatives and very committed to obfuscating other causes with this negative political correctness. Alberta likes to keep it simple, straightforward, practical and honest. Politically correct is fine in Alberta if it works and is practical. Alberta has lots of God and oil. BC has lots of covens and alternative life styles including polygamy and trees.
BC has an Ocean and Mountains and those are BC’s only and major benefits; its saving grace. Otherwise most people would choose Alberta. Four strong winds that blow lonely, seven seas that run high, think Ill go out to Alberta, weather's good there in the fall, got some friends that I go to working for….
Or something like that.
Friday, April 28, 2006
Headlines the Liberals Never Saw
Canada USA reach Softwood Deal
And the games all star MVP playing at center was none other then the player we got for Stronach and Brison none other then the Honourable David Emerson who honestly called it when he said he could do more for his constituency and his province by being a Conservative. God bless you David Emerson.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Confronting the Islamic Crusade(Clean Break)
The Muslim Crusade(Invasion) has started. The war in Iraq definitely makes the world, including Canada, have to focus on the issue that will affect all of us for the coming half century. And I would add the 10's of thousands of Syrians now dying are doing so because of the USA' s war in Iraq. Some would describe that issue as achieving a peaceful coexistence between Islam and the rest of the world. I describe it as the confronting of the Islamic Crusade.The issue is not the nature of the West, but rather the nature of Islam from Pakistan to Morocco from Bali to Madrid, from Beslan to London, from Sharm al-Sheikh to Cairo, from recently in Egypt to 911 in New York, from cartoons to killing priests. So many pieces of evidence about this Islamic Crusade, makes it hard to deny. Some can not see it. Some say Iran is a clear and present danger. This Muslim Crusade is against every culture. Either you are Muslim or you are an Infidel. Consider Mumbai, India and the Muslim terrorists there.
Liberal or Conservative. When do we all wake up? It is time to get deadly serious.
To listen to the likes of Osama Bin Laden, (or the leader of Iran for that matter), one would get the impression it is the Western World that is the aggressor. Invariably they always point to the Israel/Palestinian conflict as an example of lands being taken away from Arabs to justify themselves and their Crusade. They make this accusation to jump shift the perception of the conflict, from the nature of Islam, to the nature of Israel's Jews and their "promised lands" or religious goals. It is fascinating to see the CBC side with the Lebanese and excuse the Hezbollah rockets sent into Israel while demanding a balanced response by the state of Israel. These very same leftest would be demanding action when the rockets are landing in an Ottawa back yard.
However this war in Iraq brings the real issue into focus and forces the world to acknowledge that the problem is, equally if not more so, the nature of Islam. These wars will go on until Islam deals with the shortcomings of their violent Shariah Islamic nature. ..or are forced to which is more likely: i.e. World War III.While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women.
One can not have politics based on the fear of death as persuasion. Iraq forces a choosing of the way for Arabs and the Islamic world. Do they want politics based on fear of death or politics based on non- violent democratic free choice? Fear or free will Faith, that is the question! Never mind about the 1900 year old dreams of the "promised lands" and the West Bank issue. The problem is the nature of Islam.
There are leaders, especially military types, like Ariel Sharon who are miles ahead of everyone else. Like chess players they see the board so many more moves ahead. I remember a speech he made, directed at the USA, shortly after 911 pleading for Israel to not to be treated like Czechoslovakia. Historians will remember that Britain and Europe made peace with Hitler by letting him have Czechoslovakia. Of course that country wasn't enough for Germany, as Germany next marched into and took Poland which started the Second World War. To days Czechoslovakia was Kosovo which the Muslims got over the Serbs. They also want Kashmir,Israel,Spain,France, and most of Southern Russia.
These World Wars always start after a tip in the balance of power eh! The downing of the Berlin Wall was the more recent tip. And France is playing the same game of sitting on the fence except this time they will get a picket up the asshole.
Who in the world would want a neighbour who uses suicide bombers, and kills innocent people to advance their arguments? Who? Sunnis? Shia? Kurds? Jews? Pakistanis? Russians?Americans? Who? Muslim terrorists are a kind of people who are a virus that must be exterminated be they in Lebanon or Canada.
The answer to the previous question, Mr Osama Bin Laden, is no one wants you as a neighbour other then some left wing chickenshit who will not speak up. The same answer goes for Mr. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. That answer would be the same answer whether you are a Buddhist, a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, or an atheist because people world wide all use the same brain cells. All people would choose to exterminate that kind of virus.
The real insanity or injustice to Muslims has to do with the extent to which the USA is controlled by Jewish Americans certainly at least as far as its foreign policy is concerned. That is evident by reviewing the document, "A Clean Break" ( Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy ). That document signed by the senior Jewish people (Richard Perle, Douglas Firth, David Wurmser,) in Bush's Whitehouse predicts the war in Iraq, points to a war in Iraq, and justifies a war in Iraq for Israel's sake not , I repeat NOT, for the sake of the USA. Those guidelines set out in that Clean Break document were adopted by Wolfowitz and Bush when the naive Bush declared his National Security Strategy. How many young Americans have died for Bush's naivety or for Israel's sake because of this National Security Strategy? Dispite all of this, Osama cancelled it all by employing such illegitimate means on 911.
Was Baraks offer really reasonable? Not really! What is the difference between Hamas and Al-Qaeda? If Hamas resorts to suicide bombings does this make Saudi Arabia complicit? What is the difference between a suicide bombing and a suicide nuke? Is this an Islamic Crusade or Christian Crusade? I think the answers are obvious.
Liberal or Conservative. When do we all wake up? It is time to get deadly serious.
To listen to the likes of Osama Bin Laden, (or the leader of Iran for that matter), one would get the impression it is the Western World that is the aggressor. Invariably they always point to the Israel/Palestinian conflict as an example of lands being taken away from Arabs to justify themselves and their Crusade. They make this accusation to jump shift the perception of the conflict, from the nature of Islam, to the nature of Israel's Jews and their "promised lands" or religious goals. It is fascinating to see the CBC side with the Lebanese and excuse the Hezbollah rockets sent into Israel while demanding a balanced response by the state of Israel. These very same leftest would be demanding action when the rockets are landing in an Ottawa back yard.
However this war in Iraq brings the real issue into focus and forces the world to acknowledge that the problem is, equally if not more so, the nature of Islam. These wars will go on until Islam deals with the shortcomings of their violent Shariah Islamic nature. ..or are forced to which is more likely: i.e. World War III.While other legal codes deal primarily with public behavior, Sharia law covers public behavior, private behavior and private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Islam's Sharia law is the most intrusive and strict, especially against women.
One can not have politics based on the fear of death as persuasion. Iraq forces a choosing of the way for Arabs and the Islamic world. Do they want politics based on fear of death or politics based on non- violent democratic free choice? Fear or free will Faith, that is the question! Never mind about the 1900 year old dreams of the "promised lands" and the West Bank issue. The problem is the nature of Islam.
There are leaders, especially military types, like Ariel Sharon who are miles ahead of everyone else. Like chess players they see the board so many more moves ahead. I remember a speech he made, directed at the USA, shortly after 911 pleading for Israel to not to be treated like Czechoslovakia. Historians will remember that Britain and Europe made peace with Hitler by letting him have Czechoslovakia. Of course that country wasn't enough for Germany, as Germany next marched into and took Poland which started the Second World War. To days Czechoslovakia was Kosovo which the Muslims got over the Serbs. They also want Kashmir,Israel,Spain,France, and most of Southern Russia.
These World Wars always start after a tip in the balance of power eh! The downing of the Berlin Wall was the more recent tip. And France is playing the same game of sitting on the fence except this time they will get a picket up the asshole.
Who in the world would want a neighbour who uses suicide bombers, and kills innocent people to advance their arguments? Who? Sunnis? Shia? Kurds? Jews? Pakistanis? Russians?Americans? Who? Muslim terrorists are a kind of people who are a virus that must be exterminated be they in Lebanon or Canada.
The answer to the previous question, Mr Osama Bin Laden, is no one wants you as a neighbour other then some left wing chickenshit who will not speak up. The same answer goes for Mr. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. That answer would be the same answer whether you are a Buddhist, a Jew, a Muslim, a Christian, or an atheist because people world wide all use the same brain cells. All people would choose to exterminate that kind of virus.
The real insanity or injustice to Muslims has to do with the extent to which the USA is controlled by Jewish Americans certainly at least as far as its foreign policy is concerned. That is evident by reviewing the document, "A Clean Break" ( Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy ). That document signed by the senior Jewish people (Richard Perle, Douglas Firth, David Wurmser,) in Bush's Whitehouse predicts the war in Iraq, points to a war in Iraq, and justifies a war in Iraq for Israel's sake not , I repeat NOT, for the sake of the USA. Those guidelines set out in that Clean Break document were adopted by Wolfowitz and Bush when the naive Bush declared his National Security Strategy. How many young Americans have died for Bush's naivety or for Israel's sake because of this National Security Strategy? Dispite all of this, Osama cancelled it all by employing such illegitimate means on 911.
Was Baraks offer really reasonable? Not really! What is the difference between Hamas and Al-Qaeda? If Hamas resorts to suicide bombings does this make Saudi Arabia complicit? What is the difference between a suicide bombing and a suicide nuke? Is this an Islamic Crusade or Christian Crusade? I think the answers are obvious.
Sunday, April 23, 2006
Headlines the Liberals never saw.
For Liberals who believe in conditional sentencing.
For Liberals who believe in touchy feely peaceful solutions to dealing with Muslim terrorists.
Was it not a Canadian Liberal government who sold nuclear reactors to Pakistan for the peaceful purposes of making electricity? Who else is now saying making electricity is what they will do? Another country over there.
More Liberal ideas to study maybe.....Green Glowing Pigs
Headlines the Liberals never saw. Canada, U.S. reach framework agreement on softwood lumber.
Headlines left wingers want to see.... 4 dead and 2200 to go
For Liberals who believe in touchy feely peaceful solutions to dealing with Muslim terrorists.
Was it not a Canadian Liberal government who sold nuclear reactors to Pakistan for the peaceful purposes of making electricity? Who else is now saying making electricity is what they will do? Another country over there.
More Liberal ideas to study maybe.....Green Glowing Pigs
Headlines the Liberals never saw. Canada, U.S. reach framework agreement on softwood lumber.
Headlines left wingers want to see.... 4 dead and 2200 to go
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Harper Shows His Canadian Values
Harper will go one on one with Gord Miller of the The Sports Channel. He picks Calgary and Ottawa for the final. That shows me he knows his hockey.
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
The "W" word is used by Israel
And the word "war" is used. THAT certainly makes one sit up and take note.
Israel's U.N. ambassador, Dan Gillerman said that a new "axis of terror — Iran, Syria and the Hamas-run Palestinian government — was sowing the seeds of the first world war of the 21st century"
Israel's U.N. ambassador, Dan Gillerman said that a new "axis of terror — Iran, Syria and the Hamas-run Palestinian government — was sowing the seeds of the first world war of the 21st century"
Monday, April 17, 2006
Mexicans Getting Kinda Arrogant
My sympathies kinda go out to the Americans who have been invaded by a foreign people. These foreign people, Mexicans, from another country, Mexico, are now threatening the Americans to accept this invasion or else. See this story. This is notice to Canada to ensure all immigrants are here lawfully and to do so NOW not later. The real insanity is when illegal immigrants demand changes to the fundamental laws like Mexifornia does. It is time to say no to illegal immigration not to mention kidnapping. Meanwhile Mexicans are the welcome wagon to arrivals to Detroit.
Considering what the people of Mexico have done to Mexico, what is to say they won't do the same to the USA? Let's face it, the way Mexicans have gone about immigration shows you the respect Mexicans have for law and order. Are corrupt cops and officials in the USA too far behind? You know "little bites".
It would be interesting to see some Liberals being interviewed on the CBC for their views about what the USA should do on their immigration policy. Liberals want to tell the USA what to do with everything else.
I have to say, if Mexicans were to do that to Canada, that as a third generation Canadian I consider myself an aboriginal and would demand tax free status for my descendants forever just like the immigrant aboriginals before me.
Considering what the people of Mexico have done to Mexico, what is to say they won't do the same to the USA? Let's face it, the way Mexicans have gone about immigration shows you the respect Mexicans have for law and order. Are corrupt cops and officials in the USA too far behind? You know "little bites".
It would be interesting to see some Liberals being interviewed on the CBC for their views about what the USA should do on their immigration policy. Liberals want to tell the USA what to do with everything else.
I have to say, if Mexicans were to do that to Canada, that as a third generation Canadian I consider myself an aboriginal and would demand tax free status for my descendants forever just like the immigrant aboriginals before me.
Friday, April 14, 2006
Should I have stayed a Liberal?
I did a mental review or doublecheck of the reasoning and my decision to quit the Liberals and join the Conservatives. After some honest thought, I reaffirmed my decision whole heartedly. The bottom line was the thought that I should have switched 8 years ago after Chretien's first four. Because today for the first time in over a decade I don't feel so cynical or disillusioned, or uncomfortable in my own country. I don't feel like am unethical phoney with no direction which is how I felt supporting the Liberal Party. I am starting to see our country clearly and in focus. I have a new found energy for Canada and for the Conservative view. I believe. And with that belief am able to commit and stand up for Canada. That is so refreshing. Energizing.
I wander around various blogs, left or right, and read away and can recognize where I came from and got to. I came across one that was especially poignant. It got me shaking my head in agreement. This is the Climbing Out of The Dark into the Conservative light blog. Have a read. Bang on the money. He says, "After 13 years of Liberals doing nothing, I listened to an activist (Liberal) saying the Conservatives are 'running out of time.' They've only been in power 2 months!!! But, they are running out of time?? I didn't hear these people running off at the mouth about the Liberals running out of time."
I had to agree. The Liberals and the NDP are grabbing at straws trying to make mountains out of molehills and it is so apparent.
Or he said, "Enviro weenies running scared, saying, the opposition should bring the Conservatives DOWN, because they are cutting funding to their groups, that have had 13+ years under the Liberals, to do something, but haven't. As a matter of fact the greenhouse gases have increased by 30%. Don't blame Kyoto, blame these weenies for getting grants and doing nothing for 13 years."
I had to agree.
Climbingoutofthedark says, "NDP were harping about passports.....hummmmmmm... that bill was passed in the US Congress 2 years ago (you know another COUNTRY), what did they do about it??? Must be "moved on quickly. Okay, my head aches, eyes are spinning....everyone knows what's best for us the voters, and all of a sudden, everything is needed immediately, or sooner."
I had to agree. Who are we to tell another country to rescind their laws dealing with their security. Where have the NDP and Liberals been for the last two years. The Liberals with NDP support were governing. Now it must be moved on quickly.
He said, "One thing I notice watching/listening to all these pleas, is a shrillness, a panic. I smell fear!!"
I had to agree. The more Liberal or NDP blogs I read the more I can see their fatigue, and their fear with the Liberal apparatus. The various supposed Liberal leader contenders can sense it as well. Thats why the long time Liberals aren't running. They know the Liberal Party has to hit bottom and they ain't there yet. They are proceeding on the basis that the "masses are asses" and can be conned into buying a cosmetic change as representing a change in their soul. They are treating the Canadian voter like that ass who can not be trusted with his own money cause he might waste it on beer and popcorn.
Then you can read the typical left wing stuff that gives you a headache. I read them and shake my head "no". These ideas are contrary to everything I have seen in 60 years of living.
Then I read a bunch of Liberal blogs and I see the same disillusioned feelings of being adrift I felt before joining the Conservatives.
For some reason many of the Liberal supporters are Anti-American. This has a lot to do with the CBC and Bush neither of whom represent Canada. When one reads the Liberal blogs, they all have negative feelings about Bush and American politics; as if that justify's their belonging to the Liberals. Dislike of Bush is the one common basis to all Liberals. One thing I notice watching/listening to all these Liberal Blogs is their grabbing at straws, a shrillness, a panic. I see denial. I smell fear.
I am beginning to think many of them are beginning to recognize that Conservatives have some good points that have long needed addressing about a variety of topics. And the Liberals deserved being turfed. About the only thing holding the Liberals together is this negative feeling about another country's President. And those negative feelings prevent them from looking at their own issues. The Liberals are not ready to look in the mirrow. Like Michael Jackson says or sings," If you want to make the world a better place take a look at the man in the mirrow and....... make a change." Pointing their finger at Bush prevents them from doing that. Harper is not Bush and Bush aint so bad. The Liberals are hiding behind that pointed and wagging finger.
I recently read Ann Coulter about the American immigration issue and found myself in total agreement. There are so many issues that Canadians have ignored for years out of fear of being politically incorrect. The more I see of Harper I more I know who let the dogs out. It was the Conservative Party. I dont care who the Liberals get to lead them. I ain't going back.
I like a Prime Minister who says, "Fuck you" to the press. It is about time. I remember Chretien being interviewed by the CBC's Peter Mansbridge the day before the election in 1996. Firstly it should be noted that the CBC gave Chretien the last or hammer interview, the night before the election, compared to the other leaders. Nothing blantant about the bias of the CBC. And I remember thinking when it was finished that not only, did Chretien got treated with kid gloves, but also got royal treatment. It was a Chretien promotion from the get-go for 30 minutes and on the night before the election. As Chretien was leaving he shook Peter Mansbridges hand and jokingly said, "Your cheque is in the mail." Given what we have learned from the Gomery inquiry, maybe it wasn't a joke. It certainly was a very favourable and biased Liberal interview by the Canadian tax payer funded National Broadcasting station the CBC. At the time I was a Liberal and thought ha ha. In hindsight, I begrudge the CBC being a Liberal propaganda machine and an anti-American, anti-Bush, anti Republican, anti Conservative, propaganda machine on the tax payers $$$.
I like and agree with Ann Coulter's views. They are funny and reflect my thoughts completely. I wish I could apply them to Canada. The CBC no longer reflects my views at all.
As Ann Coulter says and I freely paraphrase, "There are more than 6 billion people in the world, many of whom apparently like the idea of living in one of the wealthiest democracies on Earth. But if the billions of people of the world did live here, it would not be "here" anymore. Canada is special for a reason that must transcend the right to vote or everyone would be trying to immigrate to Iraq right now; not to mention the Health Care line ups would be impossible."
There is an excellent American blog known as American Daughter which has the following picture for their countries Liberals who kindly want to give all those who entered the United States illegally guest worker visas. That picture says continent so that includes Canada. Maybe those people should try going to Iran. Not to mention as a third generation Canadian I consider myself an aboriginal and want tax free status for the rest of my ancestors lives. I hate to sound like a Conservative but it is time to stand up for Canada. And there are many Liberals who would not do that despite being entitled to their entitlements. All I can say to these Mexicans is remember the Alamo.
Monday, April 10, 2006
Social Workers Must be Fired when children die.
Soon after I first moved to Victoria on Vancouver Island, I went out for my Sunday morning breakfast and newspaper. I stopped at a local news stand and asked for a local paper. The sales person said, "Here it is. The Times Communist." I laughed as she handed me the Times Colonist. However she was right. The number of times since then I have heaved that paper in the garbage and shouted, The Times Communist, are frequent. (I must point out to anyone out east that the Liberals Provincially are the center right party in BC unlike the Federal Liberals.)
This last weekend was no exception. This relates to the Ted Hughes Report and his support for socialist ideals under the guise of protecting children. The Ex Judge points to Premier Campbell and blames budget cuts and lack of leadership in the Ministry of Children for hundreds of unfinished child death reviews not being done. This relates to investigating deaths of children in or out of the Ministry.
Then the Honourable Ex Judge undermines his credibility by acknowledging he knows where all the files are and what happened but refuses to identify the individuals involved. I repeat the verb "undermines" to emphasize I mean the withdrawal or the destruction of his credibility. Nor does he explain why somebody within the Ministry or the Coroners Office neglects to bring up the question of why those files are not being reviewed. Why are they in a warehouse collecting dust? So nobody, as negligent as they must have been, gets fired. Basically he blames the system, budget cuts or the politicians. Of course, as with any Ministry, if one criticizes it, the bureaucratic answer is always an enlargement of the bureaucracy. The real negligent mistake is ignored
The same scenario happens with Sherry Charlie the 19 month old aboriginal child who died from a beating when placed with a "kin and kith" relative. The standard practice when placing any child in care is to place the child with an "approved child care resource". That means the resource has been checked to be safe and sound i.e. no criminal record etc. This is done to ensure the "safety and well being" of the child. The child is then not at risk. Simple! One would think that the ex-judge would ask the following two questions. Who was the social worker that approved or negligently failed to approve that "kin and kith" approved child care resource? Has that social worker been discipled as in fired? What really happened? But no such luck.
That is too bad because the NDP are using the death of this child to undermine the Liberal approach to apprehensions which is to keep families together. The story is easy to follow. The Provincial Liberals wanted to decrease the number of children in care by leaving them with a family member as the approved child care resource.
It was the NDP and Carol James who played reprehensible political games, which is fine with the Times Colonist, with this issue and that is too bad as it subtracts from the integrity of the family unit. Socialists are not family friendly.
That Ministry has a culture of immunity. If one complains about a Social Worker to the Supervisor, the Supervisor backs up her Social Worker. If you complain about the Supervisor to the Team Leader, the Team Leader backs up his Supervisor. The Area Manager backs up his Team Leader. The Distict Manager backs up his Area Manager. That entire Ministry considers itself immune to examination and not subject to public exposure. Now Hughes wants the Ministry to be able to brainwash ("educate") MLA's in a small committee which is really a means of control. And, if some MLA has the gall to disagree, dont be surprised if he hears negative gossip about himself around the legislature and gets replaced on that Committee. If that Ministry doesn't like the message they assassinate the messenger, as that Ministry does not like outside control by anyone. Of course the NDP will assist in the assassination.
Ted Hughes glosses over such prime factual evidence such as since the Liberals took over in 2001 the death rate amongst children has been declining steadily year after year.
Hughes ignors the fact that since the Liberals took over in 2001 the number of children in care has declined from 10,000 a year to 9,000 a year.
Hughes ignores the fact that the number of apprehensions per year have decreased from 20,000 a year to 10,000 but only since the Liberals took office.
He ignores the fact that children who wind up in foster care as a result of an apprehension are more likely to wind up in Criminal Court on some criminal charge or another.
He ignores the fact that since the Liberals took over there have been no cases on BCTV or in the Province or some other paper about some parent being falsely accused or abused by some unnecessary apprehension or no cases about foster parents being threatened by social workers to not go public with their concerns or no cases of children having to go public with their lack of care.
Unlike under the NDP when there were more and more cases of parents coming forward and going public with their mistreatment by the Ministry of Children. You only have to review the papers in the period from 1995 to 2001.
It is not surprising that Hughes went so completely left wing on this report.The Panelist who ended up acting as his advisors were basically three in number. They included Judge Thomas Gove who is basically a social worker on the bench. His administrative Judge should assign him to two years doing exclusively Criminal Court. That would give him a new set of glasses. He was the Judge appointed by the NDP which led to the new Child Family and Community Services Act; which in turn led to the biggest spike in apprehensions this province has seen. Another advisor was the former NDP Minister of Child and Family Development Ed John and BC's former Child and Youth Advocate Joyce Preston appointed by the NDP.
The government's ability to take children away from their parents is draconian. It is a heavy handed power of the state that must only be exercised in the clearest of cases. There must be justifiable reasons, not political, or politically correct reasons. Under the NDP these reasons grew to include what one could describe as politically correct justifications. There are many but the easiest way to display this idea is over the question of "spare the rod and spoil the child". If you spank your child, do not be surprised if you lose him. The NDP would support the Social Workers use of Ritalin or other drugs to control teenagers being teenagers. On the other hand the center-right party's like the BC Liberals do not support unnecessary apprehensions and certainly not apprehensions based on what is politically correct such as parenting approaches espoused by the latest bleeding heart liberal expert or the use of drugs to settle kids down or control them etc. Getting the left and right on the same page on the States ability to take children away from their parents is impossible.
Socialists, of course, think all children are better off with the state then with their parents. God forbid they might let their kids watch TV or spend their money on beer and pop corn. You know, keep the parents working in the fields and factories. Tax em to death and have all children raised by committees of experts who know how to use Ritalin. Put them in group homes where they can be exposed to drugs and pimps trolling for hoars. Socialists are really committed to parenting by committee and that is an insane guaranteed way to fail. Blood is always thicker then water.
It is interesting to compare the California system to BC's as down there the social workers are also called probation officers and the apprehension system is closely connected to the criminal system. California has a population as large as Canada; some 33 million people. This is interesting because eventually many of the children apprehended by the state will wind up in the criminal judicial system. Put this fact to a social worker and they will say the kids were screwed up before they got them. You know the old "which-comes-first-the-egg-or-the-chicken" argument.
Hell! These socialists even know that if a teenager knows she can get a monthly clothing allowance while in foster care and an entertainment budget, why would she want to stay at home with a mother on welfare. What better way to undermine the family unit eh. Offer teenagers an incentive to leave Mom.
The Times Communist would have us believe that when Hughes talks they listen. Or that Hughes is a straight talker. Or that the Child Protection System is stretched beyond limits.
Hughes is looking for an all party committee and control over an independent representative for children and youth who reports to that committee. As if a so called independent representative for Children can control the independent Ministry for Children and an all party committee can get on the same page. So we will spend another 100 million of our tax dollars to confirm that we are protecting children instead of firing the employee that was negligent. As a result of this, I can easily predict that over the next five years the number of children in care will again increase from 9000 to 10,000. The death rate amongst children will again start to increase. The number of parents going public with their abuse by social workers will increase again. Thank you, Ms Social Worker. Thank you Ex-Judge Hughes. Thank you Times Communist.I am surprised that Hughes is willing to go that route especially as he is a former judge. One only has to sit in criminal provincial court and listen to defense counsel speak to sentence on behalf of some convict and, 9 out of 10 times, one will hear the words that "the convict is a by-product of the foster care system." Socialists are bound and determined to destroy as many families as they can and Hughes just gave them a boost.
The real laugh is Hughes asks the media to be shit disturbers to make sure the government follows through with his recommendations. The Times Colonist immediately put on display their bullshit conveyor image by an overly exuberant over the edge validation of the Hughes report and promotion of socialists ideals with these kinds of headlines in their first 3 pages for both Saturday and Sunday or two days in a row.
"When Hughes Talks They Listen"
"Who Let The Dogs Out? Ted Hughes That"s Who"
"A Scathing Review The Hughes Report"
and with a picture of PM Campbell, "Ex-Judge blames Budget Cuts"
"Child Protection System Stretched Beyond Limits"
" Hughes A Straight Talker"
"Premier Rebuked"
"Report Childs Province For Mismanagement"
"Reasons to Be Thankful To Ted Hughes"
Those are just the headlines. There was not a single article to the contrary. It made me so sick I wanted to barf all over that paper. It was with satisfaction that later on, I watched my cat piss and shit all over the Times Communist newspaper. Buggins, my cat knows what to do with crap like that. Thank God for the Vancouver Sun and the National.
I notice in Victoria a new and free paper called the Victoria News Daily. Hopefully with a new newspaper like that hotels like the Empress will not be losing any more major group bookings because of the aggressive street socialists druggies in Victoria, you know the former foster home drop outs lovingly protected by the Times Communist.
This last weekend was no exception. This relates to the Ted Hughes Report and his support for socialist ideals under the guise of protecting children. The Ex Judge points to Premier Campbell and blames budget cuts and lack of leadership in the Ministry of Children for hundreds of unfinished child death reviews not being done. This relates to investigating deaths of children in or out of the Ministry.
Then the Honourable Ex Judge undermines his credibility by acknowledging he knows where all the files are and what happened but refuses to identify the individuals involved. I repeat the verb "undermines" to emphasize I mean the withdrawal or the destruction of his credibility. Nor does he explain why somebody within the Ministry or the Coroners Office neglects to bring up the question of why those files are not being reviewed. Why are they in a warehouse collecting dust? So nobody, as negligent as they must have been, gets fired. Basically he blames the system, budget cuts or the politicians. Of course, as with any Ministry, if one criticizes it, the bureaucratic answer is always an enlargement of the bureaucracy. The real negligent mistake is ignored
The same scenario happens with Sherry Charlie the 19 month old aboriginal child who died from a beating when placed with a "kin and kith" relative. The standard practice when placing any child in care is to place the child with an "approved child care resource". That means the resource has been checked to be safe and sound i.e. no criminal record etc. This is done to ensure the "safety and well being" of the child. The child is then not at risk. Simple! One would think that the ex-judge would ask the following two questions. Who was the social worker that approved or negligently failed to approve that "kin and kith" approved child care resource? Has that social worker been discipled as in fired? What really happened? But no such luck.
That is too bad because the NDP are using the death of this child to undermine the Liberal approach to apprehensions which is to keep families together. The story is easy to follow. The Provincial Liberals wanted to decrease the number of children in care by leaving them with a family member as the approved child care resource.
It was the NDP and Carol James who played reprehensible political games, which is fine with the Times Colonist, with this issue and that is too bad as it subtracts from the integrity of the family unit. Socialists are not family friendly.
That Ministry has a culture of immunity. If one complains about a Social Worker to the Supervisor, the Supervisor backs up her Social Worker. If you complain about the Supervisor to the Team Leader, the Team Leader backs up his Supervisor. The Area Manager backs up his Team Leader. The Distict Manager backs up his Area Manager. That entire Ministry considers itself immune to examination and not subject to public exposure. Now Hughes wants the Ministry to be able to brainwash ("educate") MLA's in a small committee which is really a means of control. And, if some MLA has the gall to disagree, dont be surprised if he hears negative gossip about himself around the legislature and gets replaced on that Committee. If that Ministry doesn't like the message they assassinate the messenger, as that Ministry does not like outside control by anyone. Of course the NDP will assist in the assassination.
Ted Hughes glosses over such prime factual evidence such as since the Liberals took over in 2001 the death rate amongst children has been declining steadily year after year.
Hughes ignors the fact that since the Liberals took over in 2001 the number of children in care has declined from 10,000 a year to 9,000 a year.
Hughes ignores the fact that the number of apprehensions per year have decreased from 20,000 a year to 10,000 but only since the Liberals took office.
He ignores the fact that children who wind up in foster care as a result of an apprehension are more likely to wind up in Criminal Court on some criminal charge or another.
He ignores the fact that since the Liberals took over there have been no cases on BCTV or in the Province or some other paper about some parent being falsely accused or abused by some unnecessary apprehension or no cases about foster parents being threatened by social workers to not go public with their concerns or no cases of children having to go public with their lack of care.
Unlike under the NDP when there were more and more cases of parents coming forward and going public with their mistreatment by the Ministry of Children. You only have to review the papers in the period from 1995 to 2001.
It is not surprising that Hughes went so completely left wing on this report.The Panelist who ended up acting as his advisors were basically three in number. They included Judge Thomas Gove who is basically a social worker on the bench. His administrative Judge should assign him to two years doing exclusively Criminal Court. That would give him a new set of glasses. He was the Judge appointed by the NDP which led to the new Child Family and Community Services Act; which in turn led to the biggest spike in apprehensions this province has seen. Another advisor was the former NDP Minister of Child and Family Development Ed John and BC's former Child and Youth Advocate Joyce Preston appointed by the NDP.
The government's ability to take children away from their parents is draconian. It is a heavy handed power of the state that must only be exercised in the clearest of cases. There must be justifiable reasons, not political, or politically correct reasons. Under the NDP these reasons grew to include what one could describe as politically correct justifications. There are many but the easiest way to display this idea is over the question of "spare the rod and spoil the child". If you spank your child, do not be surprised if you lose him. The NDP would support the Social Workers use of Ritalin or other drugs to control teenagers being teenagers. On the other hand the center-right party's like the BC Liberals do not support unnecessary apprehensions and certainly not apprehensions based on what is politically correct such as parenting approaches espoused by the latest bleeding heart liberal expert or the use of drugs to settle kids down or control them etc. Getting the left and right on the same page on the States ability to take children away from their parents is impossible.
Socialists, of course, think all children are better off with the state then with their parents. God forbid they might let their kids watch TV or spend their money on beer and pop corn. You know, keep the parents working in the fields and factories. Tax em to death and have all children raised by committees of experts who know how to use Ritalin. Put them in group homes where they can be exposed to drugs and pimps trolling for hoars. Socialists are really committed to parenting by committee and that is an insane guaranteed way to fail. Blood is always thicker then water.
It is interesting to compare the California system to BC's as down there the social workers are also called probation officers and the apprehension system is closely connected to the criminal system. California has a population as large as Canada; some 33 million people. This is interesting because eventually many of the children apprehended by the state will wind up in the criminal judicial system. Put this fact to a social worker and they will say the kids were screwed up before they got them. You know the old "which-comes-first-the-egg-or-the-chicken" argument.
Hell! These socialists even know that if a teenager knows she can get a monthly clothing allowance while in foster care and an entertainment budget, why would she want to stay at home with a mother on welfare. What better way to undermine the family unit eh. Offer teenagers an incentive to leave Mom.
The Times Communist would have us believe that when Hughes talks they listen. Or that Hughes is a straight talker. Or that the Child Protection System is stretched beyond limits.
Hughes is looking for an all party committee and control over an independent representative for children and youth who reports to that committee. As if a so called independent representative for Children can control the independent Ministry for Children and an all party committee can get on the same page. So we will spend another 100 million of our tax dollars to confirm that we are protecting children instead of firing the employee that was negligent. As a result of this, I can easily predict that over the next five years the number of children in care will again increase from 9000 to 10,000. The death rate amongst children will again start to increase. The number of parents going public with their abuse by social workers will increase again. Thank you, Ms Social Worker. Thank you Ex-Judge Hughes. Thank you Times Communist.I am surprised that Hughes is willing to go that route especially as he is a former judge. One only has to sit in criminal provincial court and listen to defense counsel speak to sentence on behalf of some convict and, 9 out of 10 times, one will hear the words that "the convict is a by-product of the foster care system." Socialists are bound and determined to destroy as many families as they can and Hughes just gave them a boost.
The real laugh is Hughes asks the media to be shit disturbers to make sure the government follows through with his recommendations. The Times Colonist immediately put on display their bullshit conveyor image by an overly exuberant over the edge validation of the Hughes report and promotion of socialists ideals with these kinds of headlines in their first 3 pages for both Saturday and Sunday or two days in a row.
"When Hughes Talks They Listen"
"Who Let The Dogs Out? Ted Hughes That"s Who"
"A Scathing Review The Hughes Report"
and with a picture of PM Campbell, "Ex-Judge blames Budget Cuts"
"Child Protection System Stretched Beyond Limits"
" Hughes A Straight Talker"
"Premier Rebuked"
"Report Childs Province For Mismanagement"
"Reasons to Be Thankful To Ted Hughes"
Those are just the headlines. There was not a single article to the contrary. It made me so sick I wanted to barf all over that paper. It was with satisfaction that later on, I watched my cat piss and shit all over the Times Communist newspaper. Buggins, my cat knows what to do with crap like that. Thank God for the Vancouver Sun and the National.
I notice in Victoria a new and free paper called the Victoria News Daily. Hopefully with a new newspaper like that hotels like the Empress will not be losing any more major group bookings because of the aggressive street socialists druggies in Victoria, you know the former foster home drop outs lovingly protected by the Times Communist.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)